Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26835334-20180815181736/@comment-29775574-20180817122647

Stuey13 wrote: Saf95 wrote: SpacefighterX wrote: If there is a tie it should be hosts choice so no matter what there is no tie I have no idea why they don't do that or in the auditions I don't mind the public vote being the tiebreaker (in case of 2-2). For me the bigger problem is the judges being influenced by other judges. Whoever is second, knows how the judge before them voted; whoever is third, knows how two judges before them voted etc... That's just not right. Cherry on a top is - whoever is last to decide, always says "well this is a great position you put me into", like they are suddenly surprised. For christ sake, you've been doing this for a decade or more, you can't still be surprised by this!!

That's why they have to vote independently of each other. Write down your pick on a paper, in advance. Boom, problem solved. Yeah it would help things out a lot. And get people less mad.