Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-32402397-20190723050512/@comment-33029617-20190730225515

Tony1029 wrote: RedWhaley14 wrote: Tony1029 wrote: RedWhaley14 wrote: Tony1029 wrote: I always like variety to go through over singing but Cirque over Mackenzie would be a robbery. Cirque over Mackenzie > Ansley over Mackenzie nobody wants Ansley but Mackenzie is a lot better than both of them. Ansley is one of the worst of the night. Stephanie's Child is way worse from what I've heard, but Ansley is the second worst act. Ansley just keeps getting stopped by Simon. If she gets stopped and still goes through that would be horrible. Ansley is like Lamont everyone hates them. Stephanie's Child is bad I've seen their stuff on youtube, but their no threat cause their untelevsied and a horrible untelevised like Valerie Sassyfras part 2. I mean, it's her fault for her incompetence at choosing a track/song that's actually good for her. However, I think it's more Simon's fault because he's giving acts like Ansley a second chance that they don't even DESERVE. Acts like Ansley will be given the mindset that if they make a mistake and choose the wrong song, then Simon will swoop to their rescue. He should stop giving acts so many second chances and it should be a one-and-done deal like it is with most other performances. Especially in Judge Cuts, where you can't expect to mess up and still advance.

Luckily for you, me, everybody, Ansley has almost no chance of going through to the next round. She might be playing the child-card, but I don't think the judges are so stupid as to put someone like Ansley over someone like Mackenzie. They've put through questionable acts before (Mirror Image, PAC, GFORCE) but even the foggiest of decision making has its limits.