Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-25150955-20180215180421/@comment-25150955-20180424013223

i guess carebear sort of has a point, but we shouldn’t immediately discredit an act if they are young, of a certain gender, or for the type of act. a young, male country singer could still be a deserving winner of they are talented in what they are doing. the same goes for, say, a 40-year old female aerialist. we shouldn’t immediately discredit the idea of a singer winning, or a male person winning, or a young act winning, just because they have those qualities. if they are a good talent, then they have every chance and reason to win.

it’s frustrating that this mentality seems to be prevalent when judging acts nowadays, because, really, we shouldn’t base the quality of these acts off of who they are or the general gist of what they do. a bad magician should not win. an amazing young singer could win.